When to use the word ‘Industrious’

There’s no denying the importance of a clean, well-ventilated workspace.

While you don’t need to wear a mask, you do need to be aware of the chemicals you’re using, and always wear gloves when handling chemicals.

While we’re on the topic, when to use ‘Industious’ or ‘Industry’ is still an issue.

‘Industrial’ is often used to describe a person who does all of their own work, while ‘Industries’ are often used in a general sense, like the apparel industry.

The two terms are used interchangeably, but if you’re unsure of what to use, you should always use the terms as they refer to the same thing.

For example, if you work at an apparel factory, you might use the term ‘factory factory’ instead of ‘firm factory.’

To use the words ‘Industrially’ and ‘Industrying’ as a single term, you’d use the two terms interchangeably.

For instance, you can use ‘industrially clothing’ and your clothing manufacturer would call you ‘industrious’ or even ‘industry-trained’ for your job.

The dictionary defines the word as: a name given to a group of people whose business or activities include the production of something or to whom a product or service is specifically offered.

The adjective ‘industrian’ comes from the Latin word ‘industria,’ which means “good.”

The noun ‘industrin’ comes also from the same root word, meaning “good quality.”

To understand the meaning of the word, you need to know how the word was originally used in English.

In 1787, Benjamin Franklin wrote: A person who is industrious is a person that is industriously engaged in the manufacture of things or services, who is of a disposition to produce a greater quantity of goods or employ a greater number of hands, as well as the person who produces, assembles, and assembles things or assembles services; that is, to do work in the manufactures of something for a greater profit or the satisfaction of the wishes of others.

So ‘industriness’ was originally an adjective.

But in the early 19th century, it was replaced by ‘industritual.’

For more information on the history of ‘industries,’ you can read our article on the origins of ‘working’ and our article about the meaning and history of the term “industry.”

To learn more about how ‘industrual’ and other workplace terms were first used in the 1800s, check out our article, “The Invention of the Industrial Workers of the World.”

You can learn more in our article “How We Got the Industry Terms We Know Today.”

How to read Dow Industrial Average

Dow Industrial average fell to a four-year low on Wednesday as the Dow Jones Industrial Average fell to 19,823, the lowest level in more than two months.

The Dow was last in the 20,000s on Aug. 15.

The Dow Jones industrial average fell below 19,800 for the second straight day, marking the first time in the last two months that the index has dropped below 20,800.

The index is the benchmark for all major industries.

It was the worst day for the Dow in more, as it ended the week at its lowest level since Jan. 7.

The S&P 500 and Nasdaq both fell, as well.

The Nasdaq fell 1.3 percent and the S&P 500 dropped 2.1 percent.

The Nasdaq was also in the red for the fourth straight day.

The benchmark index closed at 19,724.25.

The S&p 500 closed at 2,067.17, its highest level since July 8, while the Dow was down 0.4 percent at 20,959.80.

The broader S&ps index of more than 100 major companies fell 0.9 percent.

For the week, the Dow gained 20.15 points, or 0.7 percent, to 19.867.55.

The Standard & Poor’s 500 Index gained 2.2 points, dropping to 2,907.30.

The Russell 2000 index of companies that have posted quarterly earnings dropped 1.9 points, ending at 2.539.35.

The broader S+P 500 index of S&Ps gained 1.7 points, finishing at 1,947.63.

The index closed in positive territory on Tuesday.

The CBOE Volatility index closed above 1,100 for the first three-day stretch.

The gauge has been below 1,000 since late January.

The CBOE was above 1.100 for more than five straight days.

The ICE Nasdaq dropped 0.2 percent.

Sierra Pacific Industries says it will stop producing marine life

Sierra Pacific is the world’s largest producer of marine products and the second-largest producer of seafood.

But its marine-product production has also been under scrutiny by environmentalists and environmental groups.

Now, the company is warning that it will cut back on its marine products.

The company’s chief executive, Joe Stiglitz, made the announcement during a recent conference call with analysts.

Sierra Pacific will be “taking steps to reduce the amount of products we use in the seafood industry,” Stigliz said.

The announcement comes on the heels of a decision by the US government to cut off federal funding to the company’s marine-fishing program, which it said was “an overreach of federal environmental policy”.

The move came as a result of an investigation by the Department of Justice into allegations of corporate corruption and illegal lobbying.

“Sierra Pacific is committed to working to reduce our environmental footprint while continuing to provide high-quality seafood products to our customers,” Stibgliz said in a statement.

Sierra will begin phasing out marine-products by 2023, the statement said.

In addition to its seafood industry, Sierra Pacific owns and operates industrial refrigerators and other refrigeration and air-conditioning systems, as well as refrigeration equipment for aircraft.

Sierra is a major contributor to the global tuna trade.

The tuna trade has been hit by an unprecedented number of illnesses from the mercury-contaminated fish.

In March, Sierra said that it would phase out its tuna-farming business by 2027.

“We are working to determine how to best manage our global tuna fishing business in a way that promotes the health of our customers and the environment,” Stiglitz said.

“This decision reflects our commitment to the sustainable use of our resources and to a sustainable future for the Pacific Northwest.”

How to make money from your favorite brands: Why do I need to be a millionaire to earn a living?

The average annual salary of an Indian factory worker is Rs 5,200 (about US$7,500) per month, which equates to about $11,000 (about £6,000) per year, according to data from the National Sample Survey Organisation.

The average income for a typical Indian worker is less than that and this includes salaries and allowances, says a 2015 report by the Council for Indian Industry (CII).

In 2016, the average annual income of a factory worker was Rs 15,000 ($21,600) per annum, while the average monthly salary was Rs 3,200 ($4,400).

The survey showed that manufacturing was the second-most popular occupation for Indian workers with around 50% of them in manufacturing.

The report, titled The Importance of a Profitable Company, said that the average salary of a worker in a factory was Rs 2,200 per month (about $4,000).

In contrast, manufacturing was more popular among professionals and executives with the average salaries of Rs 1,200 to Rs 2.50 (about Rs 2 to Rs 4,000), said the report.

The survey also said that factory workers earned around Rs 10,000 per month.

The CII reported that manufacturing accounted for about 11% of India’s GDP.

How a hotel industry trade group has become a new weapon in Trump’s war against the press

Washington — In a bid to blunt Trump’s populist appeal and blunt criticism of his administration, the National Hotel Association on Tuesday released a sweeping plan to improve hotel conditions in the United States.

The trade group’s proposed reforms include expanding use of automated systems to assess hotel rooms and improve quality controls, which include using more data, more reviews and more monitoring.

The proposed changes would create a federal-level office that would report directly to the president and the hotel industry to address concerns raised by the public, the group said in a statement.

The National Hotel & Lodging Association also plans to launch a website with an in-depth look at hotel conditions and recommendations for hotel management.

The association also plans the creation of a public-private partnership to better understand the conditions in hotels and to create a more effective communication tool to the public and hotel industry.

The hotel industry’s pushback to the proposed changes comes as the administration has pushed hard to rein in its power, including a plan to slash regulations and rein in the president’s power to regulate the industry.

Trump, in an interview with The Associated Press, said he will try to “get the hotel lobby to be quiet” on hotel industry issues.

But hotel industry leaders have said the administration should not be able to make hotel rooms fit for human habitation and that the industry is already experiencing unprecedented challenges.

In the past year, the hotel trade group, which represents more than 20,000 hotels across the country, has been vocal in calling for Trump to end his regulatory clampdown on the industry, including the establishment of a hotel task force to review hotel safety standards.

The group has also called for a more transparent and transparent government, and to provide greater protections to consumers.

The president’s travel ban and other measures to roll back consumer protections and increase the federal government’s influence on hotels are pushing many hotel rooms to the edge of collapse, said John Fetterman, a former president of the National Association of Realtors, who is now a fellow at the Brookings Institution.

The industry is also worried about the potential impact of the new federal office, which could open the door to lawsuits and other legal challenges.

The new office, he said, would provide an outside watchdog that could be more aggressive than the Trump administration’s current Office of Management and Budget.

The task force would also be responsible for investigating complaints about hotel safety, Fettermann said.

He said that the Trump White House has so far not provided a clear outline of how the office would work, but suggested it would focus on issues like quality of life for travelers, staffing levels and the availability of affordable lodging.

In its proposal to improve conditions in U.S. hotels, the association says the task force will include representatives from the National Institutes of Health, the Department of Justice, Department of Housing and Urban Development, the U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization and other federal agencies.

The task force’s mandate would be to identify and identify areas that can be improved, with the goal of improving conditions by 2030.

In a statement, the task group called on Trump to “focus on improving the lives of travelers and guests” by implementing the recommendations in the proposal.

Trump has taken a series of populist positions on trade and immigration, including his proposed ban on travelers from Muslim-majority countries and his efforts to revive the coal industry.

He also has taken the stance that a border wall along the U,S.-Mexico border will cost $19 trillion, a claim that the American Hotel and Lodging Associations, a trade group representing more than 1,200 hotel chains, said it does not agree with.

The new group, whose members include several top Trump aides, also said that hotel occupancy rates across the United State are expected to continue to fall.

It said the average occupancy rate for hotels across all sectors of the economy, including hotels, bars, restaurants and bars, is expected to drop by 10.3 percent, or about 3,000 rooms, from 2021 to 2022.

What’s the difference between industrial bar stool and industrial chair?

What’s up, bro?

I was looking for a good industrial chair, but what I was really looking for was a good bar stool.

You know, the kind of bar stool you get from a bar.

Well, there are two options: the old fashioned industrial stool and the industrial chair.

The old fashioned is a piece of furniture that was originally designed to sit on a table and was then put to use in a bar setting.

The industrial chair is a table or chair that has been bent into a shape that allows it to be easily used in a dining room or office.

The new industrial chair has been engineered to sit upright in a modern setting and is intended to be used by a variety of office workers.

There are a number of advantages to using an industrial chair instead of a standard bar stool: it’s less expensive and can last longer; it is easier to use; and you can make a variety and styles of industrial chairs.

To find out what’s going on with industrial barstools, we asked an expert about the differences between the two.

How does the old-fashioned industrial stool differ from the new industrial?

First off, a lot of people think that the old industrial stool is the best option for an office space.

In fact, there’s actually a lot more to an office environment than just the table.

The old industrial is very easy to use.

You don’t have to move your feet a lot to use it.

It’s more ergonomic than most industrial chairs, which makes it easier to hold in your hands.

It’s also much cheaper than an office chair.

If you have a small space, like a small dining room, it might be easier to find a new chair, especially if you’re working in an area where chairs are expensive.

As for the differences in cost and convenience, it’s not that simple.

The basic industrial bar is actually about the same size as an office desk and it can hold up to 8 chairs.

There’s also a lot less of a cost to the old wooden stool than the new steel or plastic industrial chair: it costs about the equivalent of $40 for a standard industrial stool, but about $150 for a new steel industrial chair and $400 for a plastic industrial one.

The reason it costs so much more is because it takes up more room in the bar.

The bar stool is more compact and can sit on more surfaces.

On top of that, there is a lot that can go wrong when it comes to an industrial stool.

The foam padding in the old wood stool tends to flex under the pressure of heavy use.

Also, there may be a little extra weight that needs to be added to the bar stool to help it stay upright.

If your office is small and you work from home, it may be more of a problem for you to move around a lot.

If you have big office spaces, you may want to consider a bar stool instead.

How to get rid of all those old computers that keep you awake at night

Businesses and businesses of all sizes are struggling to cope with the increasingly digitized workplace.

But while there are plenty of gadgets that can help with the transition to the new world, a growing number of jobs have been left to machines, according to a survey released Monday by the Association of Computing Machinery (ACM).

Some of the best-known machines are those that help companies process information and do data processing, but the survey also found that more than half of businesses with data centers are struggling with how to manage their data.

Most of the computers are based on Intel, a company that has long been a darling of tech companies.

But with the rise of new computing platforms, Intel’s popularity has dwindled.

In the past few years, the company has been under fire from some quarters for failing to make the leap from its own computers to newer ones, including its x86 Xeon chips, which are more widely used in personal computers.

In addition to those Intel-based servers, companies with data center-based systems can count on Microsoft Corp.’s Azure cloud computing service, which offers data processing and storage, and Google Inc.’s BigQuery database service, for processing large amounts of data.

These cloud computing services have been particularly popular among businesses that have data centers and need to quickly handle the vast amounts of information generated by a massive number of computers.

“The biggest trend in our industry is that we are getting more and more into the data center,” said Paul Pestano, president and CEO of ACM, which conducted the survey of 1,000 business leaders.

“In many cases, it is an IT strategy, rather than a software strategy, and they are taking on a data center role.”

In addition, ACM found that the use of cloud computing is increasing in the consumer space, where it accounts for nearly half of all computing and data center spending.

The association surveyed business leaders, business owners and executives, and found that nearly half said they are working to automate their processes.

The most common reasons for these tasks include the need to automate processes and manage their resources, such as running more data processing operations on their servers or transferring files between servers.

For example, when the company needs to transfer a large file, it might use the cloud, while if it is just a few files, it may rely on a physical file server.

ACM also found a growing trend in the workplace: In recent years, companies have been turning to automation to reduce employee turnover, particularly among the older and less experienced workers.

But as the workforce ages, companies are finding that a shift toward automation can be difficult and costly.

The survey found that 43 percent of business owners said they would have to automate if they wanted to save money.

Of those, 41 percent said they were not able to save enough money because of the cost of hiring a data and analytics firm.

Business owners also said they wanted more help in managing their workloads.

For many businesses, such a shift would mean having to create a new system for handling the data and other tasks.

ACMA’s survey found a wide range of concerns about automation.

For instance, 43 percent said that they are concerned that automation is causing problems with their business and its bottom line, while 44 percent said it is creating a negative impact on their bottom line.

And 39 percent said automation is not as easy as they would like it to be.

Businesses have also expressed frustration that they can’t get a clear picture of how automation will affect their bottom lines.

About 60 percent of businesses said that the biggest change they have seen in their data center environment has been the rise in automation.

This trend, however, is not necessarily because of automation.

A large majority of business leaders said that some of the biggest changes in their businesses have been the increased automation of the IT infrastructure.

ACMP also found several issues that business owners have identified in their technology infrastructure that are holding them back.

For one, they are not able or willing to deploy more of their IT infrastructure, according the survey.

Many businesses said they have had to turn to external vendors for IT services.

For another, they have not yet had the tools to properly test and troubleshoot their infrastructure to make sure it is up to scratch, according ACMP.

“When you see a system that is not up to par with other IT systems, you have to ask yourself, ‘Is this something I need to fix, or is it something that is simply a byproduct of this?'” said Pestanos.

“You can’t have one without the other, and there are some serious issues in the way the IT departments are managing IT and how they are managing their IT systems.

This is not a new problem.

We have seen it over the past 15 years.

But it is a problem that is getting worse as IT services have become more sophisticated and the costs of running them have increased.”

What’s happening in Serie A and in the French Championship

Cajun Industries, one of the big names in French football, is a big company in the Cajuns of Louisiana.

In the last three years, the company has been able to make huge profits from its services.

In 2011, the Cawood, La., company made an investment of about €15 million in Cajuncagua, Louisiana.

This year, it invested €12 million in the city of Bexar, Texas.

It is also a part owner of the Baton Rouge area’s professional soccer team, the New Orleans Saints.

The team is based in Baton Rouge and the owners of Cawodas franchise in Louisiana have been paying dividends to shareholders.

The owners of the Saints are now paying dividends, too, as the team has started making big profits from television contracts, merchandising and merchandise sales.

As a result, the team’s management is now earning the salaries of its players.

The Cawoudas are a small-town team that plays in a big city and is backed by a group of local businessmen.

According to a source close to the Caws, the money is being used to pay for players to go to college and help the local economy.

The club also employs a lot of local people, like local people.

It pays its coaches salaries, too.

It has to, because they don’t have much money to spend.

But this year, the Saints made a big bet.

In 2010, they signed a contract with the Louisiana-based TV network, Fox Sports, which includes Cawoyas team.

They signed a five-year deal with the network for the television rights to Cawohaus games.

They also agreed to pay an additional €5 million to buy the team and the league.

But they did not get the money, because the league did not pay them.

The players who signed the contract and were paid were not paid.

The Saints have also decided to use their own money to buy out the team.

That is, the owners paid a sum of €30 million to the owners, the amount of which is currently €15.5 million.

That sum includes €5.5m for the team itself, €2.5mn for the ownership group and €5m to pay the players.

That means that the Saints will make €18 million, which will be enough to buy and run the team for the next five years.

The league has to be paying €35m a year to the team to be in business.

The player’s salaries are paid from the team, not the player’s salary.

The amount of the player payments is different.

In some leagues, the player is paid from his team.

But in Cawochas, the payment is the same as the salary.

It should be, because in Caws games, the players are on the pitch, but they do not have a lot to do, so they do things that help the club.

The biggest problem is that the Cawiis do not want to buy a team.

The owner of Caws is an elderly man who is also the Cowoods football coach.

He says that the players should buy their own team.

He told the local press that the money from the TV contract is being spent on players and not on the team; that the team should be bought.

And then, a week ago, the league decided to start paying the salaries from the players’ salaries.

The salary payments are the only payments made by the Cawa.

But the players do not care.

They are not happy, and the players have threatened to quit the league and quit the Saints if the league does not pay their salaries.

They said they do this because they do have the same demands that the owners have.

They want to have a team, to play football, to win trophies.

They have already won a lot.

They do not think they will lose money.

The problem is not the players, the problem is the owners.

They can’t afford to pay them, because all the money they pay goes into the coffers of the league to help the team with TV rights and merchandise.

It will not pay all of the money that is paid by the players to the owner, because of the salary payments.

If the league wants to keep the players happy, it has to pay all the salaries to the players from their salaries to their own.

The only way that will stop this is if the owners start paying their salaries directly to the player.

That would mean that the league has got to pay its players a certain amount, and that would mean the Saints would have to sell their team.

We know that the fans do not like it, but it is not that easy to stop the owners from doing it.

The fans have been demanding this since they bought the team in 2010.

They wanted a team and a stadium in their town, and they were getting no answers.

The local newspaper La Bamba had the following headline in 2010: “What is

When the ‘Industrial Bar’ was the thing to do in 2012

The industrial bar is a bar that was a staple of American culture for a while.

The term itself derives from the word bar, which in the context of bar refers to a room or bar with a large number of people sitting around a table drinking and talking.

The concept was also popularized by a band called the Industrial Barbers, who also created the word industrial, and who are now gone from the lexicon.

But there was also an industrial bar in the early days of bar, in the late 19th century, which was used to promote a particular type of bar called the industrial, which had its own rules about what it could and couldn’t serve.

The bar was typically small, with the majority of its customers either on the floor, or in an armchair.

But the name industrial derives from this era, which, in turn, comes from the idea that this was a place where people could be in a small space and do something productive.

The first industrial bar was the Old Bar in New York City, founded in 1885.

It’s now a fixture in the Brooklyn neighborhood of Bedford-Stuyvesant, a place that was famously home to the “Baron of Brooklyn.”

The idea of a small bar, with its patrons sitting around, and their interactions and conversations happening in a non-overlapping space, was something that people really wanted in their communities.

And as we get older and more people are moving to urban areas, there’s a growing demand for a place to socialize and have their conversations.

The New York Times recently published a story on the rise of industrial bar culture in the U.S. as a result of the city’s gentrification and urban renewal.

The article describes the bar as an amalgamation of several different bars, including the Old Port Tavern, the Bitter End, the Old Pines, and the St. James, as well as the Stoney Pointe, which has been called the “Oldest and the Best” bar in New Orleans.

But while there are different ways to view industrial bar, the idea of the industrial bar has its roots in the 19th and early 20th century.

At the time, the term was used as an epithet for the small bars and restaurants that were more like pubs and taverns than traditional barrooms.

The Industrial Bar was a relatively new phenomenon in the United States, so it’s important to understand what it was like to use the term.

The word “industrial” comes from a place in England where the word “bar” is an abbreviation for “household.”

The first American use of the word comes from an 1849 book called The Dictionary of Modern English Usage by Samuel Taylor Coleridge, which is used in reference to “bar, shop, inn, innkeeper, or inn.”

As the word has grown, the word used for the place has changed.

“The Industrial Bar,” for example, was first used in 1869 in the book of the same name.

And in the 1980s, the phrase came to refer to the number of patrons in a place, rather than the size of the bar.

However, this isn’t to say that the term has lost all of its power.

In the late 1800s, there was a popular idea that bars were places where people drank and socialized and that people would gather for social events.

And the word was used in that sense to describe a place of socializing.

And then, as more and more bar and restaurant spaces opened up and people started moving out of the homes of the rich, they began to use “bar,” which is what we’re referring to here, in a more generic sense.

The rise of the “Industrial” concept has changed the meaning of the term “industrial.”

As with other forms of slang, the definition of “industrial bar” is changing over time, but its usage and popularity has changed as well.

For example, the “bar and restaurant” concept in the 1920s referred to a small, intimate bar where food was served.

The idea that “bar is the place where you go to socialise” is now considered to be outdated and outdated in a way that it hasn’t been in the past.

It was a way of describing a place with a more intimate feel, which it was, but also, the bar itself was part of a larger cultural identity, and it had its place in that space.

The name “industrial,” however, has become a generic term that’s used to describe all kinds of bars and other small spaces in the modern age.

There are so many examples of people using the term to describe small bars that are no longer called industrial in the 21st century.

One example of this is in the form of an ad that was created by The New Republic, which featured a photo of a bar with its interior set in a modern day warehouse.

The ad said that the interior of the space “has been completely reclaimed” and that the space

How to watch ‘The Handmaid’s Tale’ on Netflix, Hulu and Amazon with Amazon Prime Video

The new “Handmaid’s” movie adaptation is coming to Netflix, Amazon Prime, Hulu, and Hulu Plus, the streaming service announced.

The film is set to hit theaters in 2019.

The movie follows Handmaids founder, Emmeline Pankhurst, as she tries to reclaim her nation from a new evil in a dystopian future in which women are enslaved, raped, and murdered.

Amazon Prime has already ordered “The Handmaiden,” which stars Elisabeth Moss, Melissa Leo, and Mandy Patinkin.

Amazon Prime will also stream “The End of Men” on July 26, 2019.

Netflix announced that it will also launch “The People vs. Machine” on June 28, 2019, followed by “The Last Emperor” on August 10, 2019 and “The Unstoppable Force” on September 13, 2019.

“The Handymaid’s movie is a remake of the HBO series of the same name, which premiered in 2016.

The show was produced by Lionsgate, which is owned by Amazon.

The movie is based on the novel by Margaret Atwood and will be the first book in the series.