Which companies are in trouble?

It was the kind of year where, in the months leading up to Christmas, the news was already dominated by the financial crisis, with financial analysts predicting it would be a year of “subprime lending, job losses and falling consumer confidence” in the US.

The news, however, was far from over.

In the US, a number of companies were hit hard by the crisis, and the impact of the crash has yet to be felt.

Here’s a look at some of the companies that have already reported negative results in the year so far.

Applied industrialApplied Industrial, a global software company, said it will be shedding up to 2,000 jobs in 2018 and 2019.

Its CEO, David Akins, told The American Business News the company will cut about 300 jobs in the next year.

He blamed the slowdown on “unfair labour practices,” including wage freezes and job losses due to the recession.

The company said the cost of making software has increased by around 10% since 2014.

“We will have to reduce the scope of our growth and focus on delivering better value to our customers,” Mr Akins said.

Goodwill IndustriesThe US consumer goods retailer is struggling to make ends meet amid the global financial crisis.

It said it lost $1.4bn last year, and is losing money on almost $1bn of purchases a day.

Its shares have plunged in 2017.

The company is currently seeking to raise $20bn to invest in new projects, including a factory in China.

It has also said it wants to hire more staff.

In 2018, Goodwill said it would cut more than 200 jobs, and its next round of layoffs would be on a temporary basis.

It expects to save about $100m in the short term.

Apple, Facebook, Amazon and Netflix are among the companies expected to report positive results.

Amazon said it expects to increase its annual profit by around $5bn in 2018, and Facebook said it plans to increase annual revenue by $1,000bn.

Apple also said in a report it would add 10,000 new employees in 2018.

However, the biggest hit to the US consumer products sector so far this year has been Amazon, which reported a loss of $6.6bn.

The retailer has been hit hard because of its massive online retail business, and Amazon’s stock has fallen by about 20% since the start of the year.

In February, Amazon announced it would begin selling e-books from Amazon.com, the company’s e-book delivery service.

The move came amid a global recession in which e-commerce sales fell more than 40% in the first quarter of 2018.

Apple said last month it planned to add 10 million employees by 2019, bringing its total workforce to more than 50 million.

It plans to hire 50,000 more people in the UK this year and 200,000 in 2019.

Netflix, Facebook and Amazon have also announced hiring plans.

The US-based companies are struggling to compete with Amazon and other big online retailers, which have become increasingly popular in recent years.

Netflix said in March that it will hire 2 million employees this year, up from 1.6 million in 2019, and that it would continue to expand its content offerings, including original shows and movies.

The streaming service said it was adding 50,00 employees in 2019 and adding 5 million in 2020.

Amazon said in September that it planned 2 million new workers in 2019 to support its growth.

The firm also plans to expand into new areas including film, music and mobile advertising.

Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos has been criticised for his investment in the online retail company Amazon Prime, which the company now sells for $99 a year.

The $99 membership comes with access to Amazon Prime Video, which offers exclusive content, a huge library of movies and TV shows and a free Kindle e-reader.

Amazon also launched an online store with a subscription service, Amazon Prime Music, which has been downloaded more than 150 million times.

Amazon Prime’s popularity is expected to continue.

Amazon Prime Video has become a hit with consumers.

It is estimated that the service has helped boost Amazon’s share price by 25% in 2018 over the previous year.

In the first three months of 2019, Amazon has lost nearly $3.4 billion on Prime Video.

What does the ‘Industrial Kitchen’ do?

A factory in India that makes industrial kitchen appliances has filed for bankruptcy protection, after the factory’s chief executive and his family were indicted on charges of embezzlement, fraud and money laundering.

The filing was made Monday in New Delhi’s high court.

The government of India, which is trying to rescue the factory, did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

The company, which has not yet filed a formal statement of claim, is also being sued in federal court in New Jersey, where the former chief executive, Ranjit Singh, was arrested last week.

According to the indictment, the company, named Industrial Kitchen, defrauded more than 100 people of about $4 million in the United States and Canada.

The indictment alleges that Singh and two of his business partners defraied at least $500,000 in tax credits from the U.S. government.

In an interview with CBS News on Sunday, Singh said he was innocent of the charges.

But he has been under house arrest in New York, where he lives with his wife and four children.

He has also been indicted on other charges in the U, including wire fraud, tax evasion and tax evasion, and he was previously arrested in Germany on charges related to fraud.

The case against Singh was first reported by Reuters.

When the new industrial revolution finally hits Brooklyn

New York City is set to become the nation’s biggest and fastest-growing industrial city in the coming years, with more than 70,000 manufacturing jobs already added, and the city’s population expected to rise to nearly one million people by 2030.

But as the industry continues to grow, the state and city are grappling with a looming demographic crisis.

The New York Times recently reported that the state is expected to lose about 3.2 million jobs over the next 10 years, or nearly 30 percent of its workforce.

By 2030, the Times projected, New York State will lose nearly one-third of its workers. 

The report found that New York’s population will increase by about 40 percent over the same period, from 5.3 million in 2030 to 9.3.

That’s a 25 percent increase, and by 2030, New Yorkers will be the largest city in America. 

A similar story is playing out in the state’s largest cities.

Over the next decade, the metropolitan area that includes New York, Washington, D.C., Philadelphia, and Boston will lose more than 1.3 billion people, or 23 percent of the country’s population.

By 2050, New England’s population is expected a little more than 2.6 million people.

New York has also become the fastest-shrinking metro area in the country, with its population expected decline by more than half over the period.

The problem of shrinking labor markets is compounded by a lack of investment in new technology. 

“It’s a very difficult situation for the city of New York because it has been growing, but it’s going to be a struggle to keep up with population growth,” said Joe Hovland, chief executive officer of the New York Communities for Change Action Fund, which focuses on community-based solutions to economic and social problems. 

To try to mitigate the problem, cities and states have stepped up their investment in workforce training, including through the State of New Jersey’s Career Opportunities Program, which was launched in 2014.

In addition to providing vocational training for workers in manufacturing, the program offers job training in the areas of technology, healthcare, law enforcement, education, and public health.

But the program is not available to all workers.

“The challenge for cities and the states is to find ways to create those jobs and make sure that the economy is not just focused on jobs,” Hovlland said.

“We need to make sure those are the jobs that are available to people.”

For example, many states, including New York state, have created new incentives for companies to hire skilled workers, with higher minimum wages and incentives for them to pay for health insurance.

The state has also created a state-funded workforce training program to help companies identify and recruit the best workers for new and existing jobs.

The program, called Career Jobs New York (CJNY), has trained more than 100,000 workers over the past three years, and has seen its share of companies invest more than $1.2 billion.

But with an estimated 1.5 million workers now working in manufacturing in New York alone, the city is struggling to meet demand.

“We are going to have to find a way to keep workers and the economy going,” said Peter Tkacznik, director of the Center for Worker-Owned Enterprises at the Institute for Policy Studies.

“And we have to get the people back to work, and to find new jobs that don’t involve manufacturing.”

For the industry that is poised to take off in New Jersey, this is a challenge for both the state government and the workforce. 

One of the biggest barriers to job creation in the New Jersey economy is the state-wide unemployment rate.

According to data from the New Hampshire Department of Employment and Workforce Development, New Jersey has a national unemployment rate of 4.9 percent, a figure that is higher than any other state. 

But according to a new report by the New England Labor Council, the New Jerseys’ unemployment rate is significantly higher than other states, with the rate in New England nearly twice as high as the national average.

The report, which found that the unemployment rate in the region is 12.6 percent, is more than four times higher than the national rate of 3.4 percent. 

It’s also much higher than many other major industrial states. 

In New York the unemployment is 25.2 percent, while in Pennsylvania it’s 7.2.

In the Northeast, New Hampshire’s unemployment rate stands at 10.4. 

New Jersey is the only state to have a statewide unemployment rate higher than 5 percent, according to the labor council. 

Despite this high unemployment rate, it’s not just the New Yorkers who are struggling to find jobs.

According a study by the Economic Policy Institute, the unemployment in the U.S. as a whole is still nearly double what it was in 1999.

The EPI found that only 1.6